A Clear Thinking Required
In a situation of extreme political turbulence, such as today, when two distinct prospects stand before the world and civilisation itself hangs in the balance, it is possible to not only survive, but to prosper only by thinking clearly. Extreme events should not be assumed to necessarily originate from separate causes. For example, is there a larger process that subsumes a) the Israeli attempt, apparently without the knowledge of US President Donald John Trump, to kill the Hamas negotiators in Doha; b) the attempt to claim, without evidence, that Russia has attacked Poland with drones; and c) the attempt to introduce civil war-like chaos into American political life through the assassination of Charlie Kirk, a Trump ally, the founder and Chairman of Turning Point International?
In order to discover the truth, Executive Intelligence Review (EIR), particularly in these moments, goes beyond information gathering to the realm of intelligence, whatever the prejudices of its audience, or the dominant analytical institutions may be. In cases such as current history, it is important, as American author Edgar Allan Poe (January 19, 1809 – October 7, 1849) illustrated in his tale A Descent Into the Maelstrom not to drown one’s judgment in the particulars of what are erroneously called current events. In this particular case, it is important to investigate apparently unconnected events as the expression of underlying processes. It is understanding the manifold of those underlying processes which can provide the means to discover the truth.
Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the widow of American political activist Lyndon LaRouche and the founder of the LaRouche Movement‘s Schiller Institute, as well as the German Bürgerrechtsbewegung Solidarität party, has issued a statement, titled The Nations of the Western Must Cooperate with the New World Economic Order!, for wide circulation. It is, in reality, a peace proposal and a proposal for a new security and development architecture. It describes how the recently held multiple conferences in Asia brought into being an increasingly consolidated, new world economic reality. The world is already now oriented to the Pacific Ocean, and potentially to the Arctic Ocean, no longer to the Atlantic and NATO.
India, Russia and China, containing three billion people and a great concentration of the world’s resources, are at the fulcrum of a larger concentration (including the Koreas, Japan and Indonesia) of the world’s most skilled workforces and most advanced technologies. If the US joins that process and abandons war, the world’s greatest age of prosperity in its history can result. And in a different sobering way, the Beijing military parade, the largest in human history, commemorating the victory against fascism in Asia – not accomplished by the atomic bomb, as is believed in the US and Europe, but through the great suffering of the 30 million Chinese and 27 million Russians who died in the war – makes the same point, demonstrating the resolve to never capitulate to fascism again.
Against that new, happy reality, decapitation strikes (Yemen, Lebanon, Iran), colour revolutions (Serbia, Serb Republic, Georgia) and sanctions, including tariffs (imposed on many nations) are being utilised by a dying empire. The British-American “special relationship” could end if President Trump pursues a new relationship with Russia and China, adopting Abraham Lincoln’s policy of constructive engagement with both those nations as allies against imperialism, rather than Winston Churchill’s policy of racialist perpetual war. Keeping this in mind, one should consider the following questions regarding two recent “extreme events”.
First, with respect to the Israeli illegal attack on Doha, President Trump’s Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reported that the US had called its ally, Qatar, to warn that nation of an impending attack by Israel, stressing: “President Trump immediately directed special envoy Witkoff to inform the Qataris of the impending attack, which he did.” She was quickly corrected by Qatari Prime Minister Muhammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani who said: “The attack happened at 3:46pm (local time). The first call we had from a US official was at 3:56pm… 10 minutes after the attack. After that, President Trump spoke with His Highness The Amir and said that he condemned the attack.”
After this, President Trump posted the following: “This morning, the Trump Administration was notified by the US Military that Israel was attacking Hamas which, very unfortunately, was located in a section of Doha, the capital of Qatar. This was a decision made by Prime Minister Benjamin ‘Bibi’ Netanyahu, it was not a decision made by me. Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a Sovereign Nation and close Ally of the US, that is working very hard and bravely taking risks with us to broker Peace, does not advance Israel or America’s goals.”
Economist Jeffrey Sachs, in an interview with judge Andrew Napolitano, commented that like the attack on Iran, the Israelis were trying to kill the negotiators, because peace might break out. President Trump stated that he did not know about something that had to be prepared over weeks – and it’s very possible that he did not know. Is that the case? Blackmail, as in the case of what Sachs described as “a Mossad agent engaged in gathering compromising materials on the American political class”, named Jeffrey Epstein, also involves Britain’s Prince Andrew, once chief weapons salesman for the Crown, and UK Ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson, who told the British media that “very embarrassing” revelations were about to appear about him. There are also the Maxwells, not only Ghislaine, but her siblings, the children of Mossad agent Robert Maxwell.
The International Peace Coalition published this article on September 11, 2025.
Meanwhile,
Boundless Ocean of Politics on Facebook
Boundless Ocean of Politics on Twitter
Boundless Ocean of Politics on Linkedin
Contact us: kousdas@gmail.com
ISMC
Boundless Ocean Of Politics 